I’ve reached the end of the Flutter introduction, having produced an “app” that will supposedly work equally well on Android and iOS. Nothing out of the way to report, as part two of the exercise was clear and correct. I even went back and removed the code that produced the “Welcome to Flutter” header. Now the app is cleaner looking with only one header.
The good news is how so many different parts worked together to accomplish this: XCode (the Apple iPhone simulator), VS Code (Microsoft’s powerful open-source editor with plugins), and Flutter (Google’s development tools with additional support via Brew). If you dig a little deeper into how VS Code is built, you’ll see that it’s built on the Electron framework which is itself based on Node.js and Angular. So there’s a lot of integration of disparate languages and supporting tools into a non-trivial cohesive working whole. I’m suitably impressed.
Unfortunately for me, I couldn’t test how this looks on an Android device. I couldn’t get the Android emulator to work from the command line, even though I powered up Android Studio and used it to install SDK support for Android 9/Pie. Using Android Studio I also started the Android Virtual Device manager to create a Pixel 2 XL Android device to simulate, but unfortunately not the current top end, the Pixel 3 XL. This apparent lack of latest device support, along with the inability to launch the emulator from the command line (required if using VS Code to develop), almost makes the use of Flutter a pointless exercise, at least for me.
But being able to easily, seamlessly, develop for both Android and iOS on the same computer (running macOS in this case), that was a failure for me. And in order to do that kind of development you need to work on macOS, because you won’t run the Apple iPhone simulator on Windows 10. Or not that I’m aware of. And possibly solving the problem by developing within Android Studio instead of VS Code is a non-starter with me, unless I were being paid to do this, and then I would (might) begrudgingly switch. But on my own nickel, nope.